Domino: A Blog About Student Debt

Some of the most notorious actors profiting off the student debt crisis are student loan servicers. A a history of lawsuits, shocking investigations, and ruined financial lives makes clear that these companies harm borrowers from the day they get their first bill to the moment they pay off their loans.

Our new report reveals tens of thousands of newly uncovered instances in which federal student loan servicers misreported borrowers’ repayment status to credit reporting agencies in apparent violation of the CARES Act and consumer financial laws such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

A growing body of evidence suggests that the student debt crisis is exacerbating America’s stark economic inequalities, with huge consequences for disparities across race and gender.

The SBPC released a new analysis of a sample of ISA contracts offered by some of the largest ISA providers in the student financing market. What we found was cause for alarm. Despite representations by lenders that ISAs are “not a loan or credit,” our analysis concludes that a typical...

We released a report revealing extensive evidence that the financial technology student lender Stride Funding, may be violating federal fair lending law, illustrating the deep fair lending risks inherent to Income Share Agreements.

On April 30, 2020, Student Defense and NCLC, with the support of the SBPC, filed a class action lawsuit against the Department of Education and then-Secretary Betsy DeVos, demanding an immediate halt to ED's garnishment of student borrowers’ wages, which the CARES Act had prohibited since March 27, 2020.

With millions of newly unemployed Americans desperate for help, unscrupulous schools and lenders are pouncing. Without substantial, immediate, and sustained action, tens of billions of dollars will flow to predatory programs that will harm borrowers, their communities, and our country for decades to come—just like in the last recession.

The results of a new investigation published today by the SBPC offer new evidence that for-profit coding bootcamps and ISA companies may be systemically violating federal law by omitting a legally mandated term from the contracts underlying students’ ISAs—language required under the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) “Holder Rule.”

An issue brief published by the SBPC and the Center for Consumer Law & Economic Justice at the UC Berkeley School of Law makes clear that the CFPB already has the power to hold for-profit colleges accountable for many of their worst practices and to protect borrowers from abuse.

The SBPC and the National Consumer Law Center wrote to the Department of Education to call for commercial FFELP borrowers to get desperately needed relief during COVID and for the Department to rectify past and present wrongs that have imposed historic hardship on these borrowers.